cglaeser

Despite many attempts, I have never been able to get email to work on Axis cameras. I have tried both domain names and IP addresses, I have tried multiple email accounts, and I have tried many settings, but I still can't get it to work. Did anyone else struggle with Axis email and then discover the secret to getting it to work? Best, Christopher

Just to be clear, I've tried both the IP address of the router and the IP address of the ISP DNS. Both methods fail with the both Axis cameras (223m and 207mw). What do I need to do this? Yes, but the log is not very useful. Oct 28 19:54:24 axis-00408c903618 smtpclient[845]: connect: Connection timed out Oct 28 19:54:24 axis-00408c903618 smtpclient[845]: Exit after failure to connect to server.

For all other applications I have always used the IP address of my router and that works fine for all other apps, but does not work with the Axis cameras. I also tried the IP address of the SBC DNS server with the Axis cameras, and that does not work either. e.g. 68.94.157.1 I also tried bypassing the need for the DNS Server by using the IP address of the SMTP server, but that too fails. I have tried to scale these walls several times in recent months, but all reasonable combinations and email accounts I can think of do not work. My Outlook on this machine has eight email accounts and they work fine, but none of these email accounts work with either of my Axis cameras. Best, Christopher

The modem is a SpeedStream 5100. I have perhaps eight email accounts (sbc, gmail, yahoo, hostmonster) and none of them have worked. Perhaps I'm doing something really dumb. Here is one example of SMTP values that do not work: Primary server: smtp.att.yahoo.com Primary server port: 25 Use authentication to log into this server: yes User name: chrisglaeser@sbcglobal.net Password: xxxxxxxx SMTP Authentication: Login From email address: chrisglaeser@sbcglobal.net What values did you use? Also, under TCP/IP - Advanced, for the Primary DNS Server I used the IP address of the router, 192.168.200.1, and for the Domain Name, I left it blank. I know what a DNS Server is, but what is the Domain Name and is it OK to leave this blank? Best, Christopher

SBC usually blocks port 25, but I made a special to leave it open, and I can use port 25 with Outlook, so I think that works. In addition, I've tried port 465, which also works with Outlook, but does not work with Axis. Doh! You're right. Just a habit I guess. Best, Christopher

DSL is via SBC, but they require SSL. I have other email accounts that do not require SSL, but I can't get those to work either. Best, Christopher

Thanks. I tried using both the DNS server and an IP address. I tried both port 25 and 465. I also disabled Norton Antivirus. Nothing has worked thus far. FTP and HTTP work fine, but can't seem to make progress on SMTP. Best, Christopher

The error message "connection timed out" is the same for all configurations, so it does not provide many clues. I've tried every possible sensible configuration I can think of, and none of them work. Although several of my email accounts do not require SSL, it would be nice if Axis would implement SSL so I could try my SSL accounts too. Best, Christopher

The contrast on the Arecont seems too high (is it possible to adjust the contrast?), but otherwise, the detail is very good. Assuming the Basler is as focused as possible, compare the detail in the leaves. The Arecont has well-defined edges on the leaves, whereas the Basler is quite soft. Certainly, the high gain of the Basler generates quite a bit of noise, but it's possible to ignore the noise if the detail is there. Is that the best possible night focus for the Basler? If so, the Arecont is the clear winner between these two. Best, Christopher

What are the shutter speeds on the Arecont cameras? Best, Christopher

I checked the Basler image in Photoshop. As I expected, the exposure is off quite a bit. There are no pixel values between 0 - 40 in the darker regions, and the sky is blown. If the shutter had been increased by one full stop, I expect the contrast in the image would look much better (though it would still be soft). Best, Christopher

It does lack some contrast, which could be the lens, or it could be the firmware or some setting does not correctly adjust the contrast. It also appears to be soft, which again could be the lens or possible the focus. That said, my Axis 223M is about the same wrt contrast and focus. I could probably play with the focus a bit more, but it's a pain to adjust, particularly at night with IR. Best, Christopher

I don't think the Arecont looks bad for a security camera, and in fact, the Arecont was the best of the group by a wide margin. The Basler is a bit pixelated, but still quite good for day use. Would be curious to see the same comparisons at night. I expect the Arecont would kick butt. Best, Christopher

Check the leaves near the top of the image. If this were a digicam, you could not give them away. Of course, it's a security cam and low light performance is far more important. I have one of the very first Canon D30 digital SLRs produced. The 3 MP images from that circa 2001 camera were incredible. Yes, I know that's comparing apples and turnips, but what a revolutionary camera that was. Best, Christopher

Thanks for posting these images. The purple fringing in the Arecont image is horrific, but for a security camera, it's not critical. It does suggest, however, that these images could be further improved with refinements to the firmware. Don't recall, have you posted the low light comparison images? Best, Christopher

Use a firewall. Best, Christopher

Can you reposition the IR? A separation of even a few feet will help reduce the bug problem significantly. Best, Christopher

Yes, white light LED flood lights will work fine. Best, Christopher

Have you posted any 502 night images? I'm getting ready to pull the trigger on one myself. I've heard the images with that lens are exceptional. Would love to see some examples. Best, Christopher

I talked to an Optex sales rep and they intend to maintain control of the sales of the RLS 3060 units. Optex will review each application prior to sale and delivery. MSRP is $6,500. The new Redwall SIP units will replace the previous generation Redwall PIR units. The new units can be mounted as high as 13' and have new anti-tamper alarms. MSRP for the SIP100 is $650. Best, Christopher

Anyone have experience with either of these two units? Are they available in the US? Any pricing information? The specifications and video clip at http://www.optexamerica.com/productpage.aspx?l1=2&l2=18&id=62 of the Redscan laser unit look great for some applications. Best, Christopher

The video suggests there is software, but it's not clear if this software is for the Optex test lab, or is just a simulation, or is software delivered to the customer. I doubt it's the latter because I did not see any suitable connectors in the specs, unless I missed it. Best, Christopher

Do you suppose the laser scan is done with a moving part? Best, Christopher

Where did you read $7,000? I assume that was for the RLS 3060. The SIP 100 should be in the range $500 to $1000. Best, Christopher

And, if you don't want to bother with a linux based system, most web hosting services support ftp. Another benefit of this approach is the thieves can not destroy the incriminating evidence if the videos/images are uploaded off-site. The cost for off-site storage can be as little as a few dollars a month for some plans. Best, Christopher