jisaac

those 484 are not bad. It definitly has to have some light. I dont think the lux is as low as it says. But they are good

oh that was funny. I got a good mental image of you acting those out. I got the idea from a customer asked me the other day what I have found my system usefull besides security. I thought for a second and grinded and dodged the question by saying, " oh so many things in my everyday life I could not even begin to answer". Because I probably would have lost any chance of closing that one if i answered that truth fully.

he said to do it. Its not his personal email address. Now that would really piss me off. Because you know some idiot has more time on there hands than they do friends. I still have a old yahoo email address from 96 (1st email address) and I check it every once in while for kicks. I average like 4,900 junk email a day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And have not used that address in like 3 years. Ridiculous! Whats really ridiculous is i get a kick out of checking it. I .

that sounds like......well never mind...I will be nice today.... Ya that is the words of a quickly sincking company trying to pull a fast one on a few peeps. I would like to know of a person who heard that explenation and actually accepted that as ok. HEY! I just thought of a fun test to try on the wife. Sad thing is I already know how she will respond. Well atleast she is pretty. P.S. Dont let my wife read this

Have a good one. isaac

that the link under the specs in the link that you guys posted earlier http://www.digitallyunique.com/cam53cir.html?src=247

Take a look at the difference in cameras. Who can guess what the differences are?

oh well I guess it is one of them "cable networks" Because they did explain the connectivity of it, remember? ( cable ) Man we would have lost without that detailed explanation of how it is connected. Oh ya and in case you have not noticed I use sarcasm just a little bit.

some thing is screwy about that website. Manufacturer Mace Group, Inc. Manufacturer Part Number CAM53CIR Manufacturer Website Address www.macally.com Product Name CAM53CIR Weatherproof Long Range IR Camera with Built-In Audio Product Type Surveillance/Network Camera Lens Type Focal Length: 4.3mm Manufacturer www.macally.com ????? Mace group, is different from Mace Security international Product Type Surveillance/Network Camera ( network??) Connectivity Technology Cable I love that type of connectivity, "cable". "Oh really I thought it was connected by sliced bread". Good thing they cleared that up.

Ok I am not crazy. Mace does not make a cam 43. That cam 43 is made by MACALLY . Looks like a want to be. Mace did not make that mistake. The company you bought that from made that mistake. Because like I said, mace does not make a 43cir so how would they get the tags mixed up? I have dealt with mace probably second only to kandcorp and mistakes have been made by them but never anything like that. (that i have seen)

thats weird. Ya that is a cam 53. I have never heard of mace doing that. But it looks exactly like the 53. It has audio microphone right? If so that seems to be the same one.

16x have been working out extremely well since I changed the shutter and turned off the day night. The cam 92's although look good at night have not impressed me during the day.

me? Not a damn thing. The owner, says he is going to cut down the tree

Has anyone had any experience? Know what the pros and cons are?

no one!?!?!?!? Wow! I figured someone would know

ya do that. I would like to see how well that works for you.

look at how much that tree grew in a month

ya with those cam 92's I was getting a good image at night. But the only way I could get it was if I had the iris opened up almost all the way. As you can tell BLC had to be pretty good to. EX. So i replaced them and got this during the day

how did you guess that cam 92? oh ya probably my website. Duh

although the night time images were not looking good. So I turned the day night off and turned the shutter up to 128. Looks a lot better at night in full color than in black and white

cam 92 on the left. Was not real impressed with the images so I complained and they sent me the cam 16x's to replace them. cam 16x's are a 192x Power zoom camera day night high resolution auto focus ac/dc pelco -d they looked alot better

nope just going to let you ponder it just kidding

close. 1st one is a cam 92. But the 2nd one is not a cam 53. If the cam 53 out performed the cam 92 i would be seriously mad. Even more mad than I was last week. Which was really mad

dvr is http://www.mace.com/products.php?cat=mace_dvr_rw&model=DVR-400RW

of course they are 2 different cameras. they are recorded under the same resolution