Securame

What models are they? I do not know of Hikvision having any moidel that does WD1 at 12fps; all 4ch models I know that do WD1, do it at 25fps (7204HWISH and 7104HWISL).

Luckyfella, .254 is the gateway (router), the DVR IP is indeed .200 And yes, you should be opening both ports 8080 and 37777 so you can access the DVR from outside the network. That looks like some old Dahua DVR.

That seems way better, and you might even have two neighbours happy to know that you are also covering their properties. " title="Applause" />

I agree with skomo; i would not want to depend on wireless/bandwidth for the recordings. The best way is to record on each site, even if that means having several small NVRs instead of just a big one. Having 10-20 IP cameras being recorded wireless seems like a bad idea.

Dahua does that. You can connect analog cameras to a Dahua DVR; and then make a NVR connect to the DVR and record the channels like it was an IP camera. Of course if you would need to buy the DVR and NVR, it would probably make more sense to just get a hybrid machine.

Your camera placement is definately way worse than your neighbours. Your cameras are not covering each other, they could be vandalised and you would not even know what happened. You have quite a blind spot on your garden, and more importantly, on your porch. If there is a window in there, then it is even worse. Also, the camera on the left is looking way too high. Why do you record the street? The main purpose of the camera should be to cover your porch and main door, and not the cars on the other side of the street. I would move them.

Just do a CTRL+F5, so the browser reloads everything and forgets what it has on the cache.

You don't have an easy way to t verify it. You would have to open the cameras and dismantle them to see what sensor it has; and even then you would probably be unable to tell apart a sensor from another. Recording size has nothing to do with camera's TVLs.

Baseline Firmware_IPC_Raptor series_En_V5.0.5 130925(Released).rar http://www.hikvisioneurope.com/portal/index.php?dir=Product%20Firmware/Cameras/Raptor%20Platform%20IPC%202%20series%20firmware/V5.0.5%20build%20130925/ I won't have to time to check it out for a while, hopefully someone will do so and comment. There is also a new version for the TI365 series, v5.0.8. Baseline Firmware_IPC_TypeC series_En_V5.0.8 130930(Released).zip http://www.hikvisioneurope.com/portal/index.php?dir=Product%20Firmware/Cameras/TI%20365%20platform%20firmware/V5.0.8%20build%20130930/

Pretty cool cameras! Edit: I surely hope they are ONVIF...

I want a VGA output display, matrox use a DVI port.. It actually has 8 displayport outputs, not DVI. You would need 8 displayport to VGA adapters. If the card comes with the 8 displayport to DVI adapters shown in the pictures, it would probably be way cheaper to just get 8 DVI to VGA adapters.

Not sure yet as I haven't gotten that far. I just want to know if I'd even be close to borderline in needing a Gigabit uplink on the switch. NVR will be a Gen 3 i7 PC fyi. You won't be even close, but if you do have a Gigabit port on the switch, use if for the NVR, of course.

Not really, what bitrate will you use with those cameras? If the NVR is connected at 100mbps, that would be more than enough to use each of the 7 cameras at a 10mbps bitrate.

I really hope that you are not comparing a PTZ camera zooming in 600 feet away to a fixed lens camera...

NO THIS IS A BAD IDEA Please explain your opinion why it's a bad idea. The OP stated he wants something that would work with IPCam. I'm new to the IP Camera field and am learning. I agree that it is a bad idea. That might be a good solution for home use, maybe just for one monitor, for an end user, etc.. 8 of those devices on 8 monitors? No way I would install that on any serious customer, I would not even want that for myself. 8 different monitors hooked up to a computer showing different desktops = computer with 8 video outputs, or more than one computer.

That one was way better! " title="Applause" />

A good VGA cable should be able to work at 1920x1080 (1080p). You have to configure the compute to work at 1920x1080, and if you are able to see the desktop correctly at that resolution without any noise, then the cable is good, and you should also be viewing video at 1920x1080 with no problems.

LOL, I was actually expecting some timelapse, not a 90 minutes video.

Its compatible with IPcam? Those are VGA and HDMI splitters, they do not do what you are asking for. A splitter will just show the same image on many monitors. If you want different output on 8 screens, you need 8 video outputs on your computer. The video card thewireguys links would do it, but it doesn't come cheap. Otherwise you can use several video cards, I am sure there are cheaper video cards with 3 outputs, but you would need a motherboard with at least 3 PCIE ports (3 cards, 3 video out each).

Nope. The wifi dongle is for connecting the DVR/NVR to your network without the need of UTP cable. It is not for connecting Wifi cams to the DVR/NVR without the need of having your own wifi network setup.

He already did try powering just one camera.

One is model KPD677, the other one seems to be KPC677. Different models, so I guess it might be that they have different cover. I have even seen the same DVR with different front covers, depending on who sold them. If you want to buy a KPD677, I would go for the one sold by focusonsecurity, even if it is a little bit more expensive. The other one says KPC677LH on the title, later on it sayd KPD677, then KPC677, and then again KPD677ZL. So who knows what he might be selling, I do not know if there are differences between those models, but maybe he just puts all the different models on the description, so he can just send whatever model he has in stock at any given moment.

Bad quality cabling maybe?

Agree with that; Cisco and Linksys are the ones I have found to do NAT loopback most often. I do have a Cisco at home, and I did have a Linksys at work until recently. We changed from DSL to Fiber 3 months ago so we got a different router, and the one we have now does not do NAT loopback, so when I need to connect to one of our own systems, I can not use the DDNS addresses, that sucks.

You do not need any "device", just a computer with multiple video cards/monitor outputs.