Hi guys. First post and i'm after some advice about standalone DVR's
I'm in the UK using the PAL system and i know the US works on NTSC, but any help at all would be appreciated
Got burgled and caught him on my current cctv. Video and still taken from it were ok just, and he admitted it eventually after almost getting to crown court. I now want to go for better quality recordings, but i'm blown away by all the specifications.
I'm after a 4 channel standalone DVR with 1 ch audio input and facility for 2 HDD's (preferably 1Tb SATA's)
The manual for my current DVR says it records at 120FPS. I guess this is NTSC so a PAL setting would be 100, across 4 channels giving 25 frames / sec per channel. However, this might be fields/sec as this would then only be 12.5 frames/sec per channel. The recording playback is lower quality than real time viewing, so as i understand it, real time would be 25 frames/sec and a 12.5 frame/sec would explain the lower quality playback.
Maplins (a bit like Radioshack in the US) are selling one that says it has 200 frames/sec across 4 cameras (£499 / $770), "giving up to twice the real time recording at 50fps per channel".
It says the record resolution is
Full (720x288), Dual (360x288), Quad (360x144).
Display frame rate 100fps.
Record frame rate 50fps(full), 100fps(dual), 200fps(quad).
This is where i get totally lost. I just want one that is better than what i already have. Basic recording. Don't need remote viewing, dvd backup etc.
Any advice or pointers would be much appreciated. I'm really lost with the full dual and quad bit. I take it quad means if i use my 4 cameras but can i take it that i'll get 50fps only if i view it at 360x144 and is 360x144 a quarter of the screen sort of size.
Record quality at full screen is my highest priority
I have it all linked into my home tv system so normal viewing is on a tv and i use my home dvd recorder to backup.
Thanks
Gary