SDM Group
Members-
Content Count
245 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by SDM Group
-
Cut it with a hacksaw and reem the inside with pliers, conduit size is usually 3/4 fill of the wires
-
Pelco Spectra or Sensormatic/American Dynamics Speed Dome, both excellent cameras
-
Found this http://www.gsm-auto.com/
-
Looks like a Sensormatic Speed Dome
-
NVR matrix distribution to multiple TV's
SDM Group replied to e173m's topic in Video Transmission/Control Devices
An easier route might be to go to Video In of the TV's -
Just took this BEAST off a house!! Replaced with Spectra
-
Burglars, Smile you're in a Bait House
SDM Group replied to Numb-nuts's topic in General Digital Discussion
http://www.unblock-us.com/?v=2 works great -
It's all Pelco except for the inside camera, about 15 years old
-
Your right, it still functioned perfectly just wanted to upgrade to a dome
-
Conduit between all buildings?
-
Is there a network in place, if there is I would definitely use IP cameras.Put a POE Switch in each IDF and install NVR Software and storage at Main MDF, client software for viewing.
-
My parents are in Torquay, got a couple of friends here from Portsmouth, big Pompey fans
-
Help with Eclipse ACC950 Card reader
SDM Group replied to misterclick's topic in General Access Control Discussion
I believe the network they are referring to is a RS485 network so the unit should have an address not an IP -
http://www.serialporttool.com/PTZ.htm
-
Ground Looping/Interference?
SDM Group replied to BangersAndMash's topic in General Digital Discussion
Installation Help -
Very Interested In the History of CCTV
SDM Group replied to emholic's topic in General Analog CCTV Discussion
You would have to have the market cornered to enforce the code and the casino industry is where I believe Pelco tried to do this initially -
Hello Tony, where in the UK
-
Very Interested In the History of CCTV
SDM Group replied to emholic's topic in General Analog CCTV Discussion
The Manchester Code seems to shadow the entire PTZ language realm. As an analogy, I understood that the Code functioned like DOS in a PC: as an underlying basic language? If that is true, then the chassis camera communications were established on top of the Manchester Code? If this is true, then did Pelco simply establish a set of awkward commands through the Manchester Code? And then, presumably, because Pelco had some influence on the market, the Pelco protocols assumed a dominant position with the PTZ realm, and this dominance was then picked up and used by other manufacturers as a defacto industry standard? N.B. I am not expecting anyone to answer this. Just thinking aloud. I would imagine their dominance in the casino market forced other equipment control and head end manufacturers to use the Pelco protocols -
Very Interested In the History of CCTV
SDM Group replied to emholic's topic in General Analog CCTV Discussion
I'd like to know who came up with the bright idea of human surveillance first -
For the larger service clients on the mainland, with an array of equipment this tool comes in very handy. It's a little short sighted to assume that all equipment manufacturers have the required protocols for all the different proprietary PTZ's out there i.e. AD Manchester, Biphase, Sensornet etc. and support different menu commands.
-
In a service situation with unknown equipment and protocols this would come in handy
-
Its good for trouble shooting in the field
-
Very Interested In the History of CCTV
SDM Group replied to emholic's topic in General Analog CCTV Discussion
I would think the PTZ protocols originated from the Manchester Code developed at Manchester University. These control commands were probably used on a pan tilt motor first via a receiver and then developed further by dome manufacturers -
Very Interested In the History of CCTV
SDM Group replied to emholic's topic in General Analog CCTV Discussion
1913: surreptious photography of imprisoned suffragettes begins. 1949: publication of George Orwell's 1984, which is set in London. 1960: Metropolitan Police use two temporary cameras in Trafalgar Square to monitor crowds attracted to the arrival of the Thai royal family. 5 November 1960: Metropolitan Police use two temporary cameras in Trafalgar Square to monitor "Guy Fawkes Day" activity. 1961: installtion of video surveillance system at a London Transport train station. 1964: Liverpool police experiment with four covert CCTV cameras in the city's center. 1965: British Railways installs cameras to watch tracks near Dagenham that had been vandalized. 1967: Photoscan (business) markets video surveillance systems to retail outlets as a means of deterring and catching shoplifters. October 1968: Metropolitan Police use temporary cameras in Grosvenor Square to monitor anto-Vietnam War demonstrators. 1969: Metropolitan Police install permanent cameras in Grosvenor Square, Whitehall and Parliament Square. Total number of cameras nationally: 67. 1974: installation of video surveillance systems to monitor traffic on the major arterial roads in and through London. 1975: installation of video surveillance system in four London Underground train stations. 1975: use of video surveillance systems at soccer matches begins. 1984: installation of surveillance cameras at major rallying points for public protest in central London. Picketers surveilled during miners' strike. August 1985: installation of street-based video surveillance system in Bournemouth, a south coast seaside resort. 1987: use of video surveillance systems at parking garages owned by local authorities begins. 1988: installation of video surveillance systems at "council estates" run by local authorities. 1989: civil rights group Liberty publishes Who's watching you? video surveillance in public places. 1992: installation of street-based video surveillance system in Newcastle (a major northern city). The system in Newcastle is closed-circuit television (CCTV) that uses microwaves (an open circuit) to link to the city's main police station. 1992: use of speed cameras and red-light enforcement cameras on the national road network begins. August 1993: bombing of Bishopsgate in London by the IRA leads to the construction of the "Ring of Steel" around the City (London financial district). Measures include street-based surveillance cameras. 1994: central government (the Home Office) publishes CCTV: Looking Out for You. Prime Minister John Major states: "I have no doubt we will hear some protest about a threat to civil liberties. Well, I have no sympathy whatsoever for so-called liberties of that kind." Between 1994 and 1997, the Home Office spends a total of 38 million pounds of CCTV schemes. July 1994: use of covert video surveillance systems at automatic teller machines (ATMs) begins. 1996: government spending on CCTV accounts for more than three-quarters of total crime prevention budget. August 1996: all of England's major cities except Leeds have video surveillance systems in their city centers. 10 May 1997: public demonstration against surveillance cameras in Brighton, organized by South Downs Earth First!. July 1997: London police announce installation of surveillance camera system that automatically reads, recognizes and tracks automobiles by their license plates. October 1998: use of face recognition software in the London Borough of Newham begins.