Ok, here we go:
I'm interested in doing some physiology research in peculiar environments/sports, mostly putting my interests (medicine) into some interesting work. I am particularly interested in fatigue/stress in sports environments, eg scuba diving (esp. cave diving), racing, flying, skiing. I'm building a modular system to acquire the relevant data in such environments. For example, I put together a basic 5-lead EKG (using RS232, now trying to switch to USB without the using serial-usb converters). I'm also capturing relevant analog signals and recording them (be they throttle position, altitude, depth, etc). But I think it would also be relevant to add to it video recording, and I'm not sure which way is suitable (analog cameras or all-digital).
Basically, I want to put together a "video module" that runs from a box and can record upto 4 video streams, with some audio as well, and synchronize the whole with other readings (eg EKG, etc).
The final product would thus allow me to play back video whilst simultaneously looking at whichever parameters I recorded.
Power is obviously an issue, but most devices run on 12v, which is what cars (and for scuba diving, DPVs) run on, so I'll have car-battery type power.
At the same time, I'm obviously trying to minimize costs, and I favor linux and embedded chips/microcontroller solutions (eg ucLinux).
Obviously, this is rather ambitious, but I think ultimately can be done for a 'reasonable' sum (and I'm not looking to commercialize this). Thus, I was thinking using firewire cards (eg the Point Grey research ones) seem best, since I can just plug them in and manage the data stream via linux to time-stamp, etc.
What I'm concerned about is the price and raw computing power needed to deal with the video stream, and size: whether I should go for analog system (which requires PCI cards, more power, etc but a PCI card could do the hardware compression) or fully digital (smaller size, parts count, but more processing required).
Let me know if this helps/more is needed.
Alex