Jump to content

joost

Members
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. joost

    DC Iris Control Circuit

    I tried it using a function generator so I could vary frequency, duty cycle and amplitude. Unfortunately it did not work. Static friction was reduced, but the forces a such that it only has two stable positions: completely closed or full open. If you want it fully open, just apply 5V to the drive coil, but any intermediate position does require some sort of position feedback, which is normally the camera's exposure level. It may just be possible to derive a position signal by measuring the inductance of one of the coils, but this will be a complex circuit for which I have no time or need to develop.
  2. joost

    Lens choices

    I tested the KOWA LMZ3510-IR and the Computar AG3Z3112FCS-MPIR that came with my Vivotek IP8151 1/3" 1.3MP camera. The Kowa is a less sharp, in particular in the corners, but also in the center. It is advertised as 5MP 1/2", but in fact does not meet the much lower camera specs. It is also much more expensive. The Computar is better, sharp all the way to the corners. The only downside is the flimsy plastic thread, you have to be careful mounting it.
  3. joost

    DC Iris Control Circuit

    I found an example circuit in this pdf file: http://www.produktinfo.conrad.com/datenblaetter/175000-199999/191004-sp-01-en-CCD_Farbkamera_m_Zoom_hochaufloesend.pdf What I figured out so far is this. A signal from 0-4V drives the iris open against a spring. An opamp circuit integrates the difference between lightlevel and setpoint and uses the output as the DRIVE signal. This would drive the iris to keep the light level constant, but there is a catch. The mechanical iris has static friction. When the driving force overcomes the friction, the iris would suddenly jump and overshoot the setpoint. It would continuously jump around the setpoint if not compensated. The break coil provides an inductive feedback signal when the iris jumps, so the drive circuit can break/dampen the output to avoid overshoot. The feedback circuit does not allow you to simply put the iris in some fixed position. This is why some manufacturers now use a servo type iris on their cameras. But there may be another approach. I have not tried it, but I think it may work. Suppose you connect the DRIVE directly to the 5V PWM output of a microcontroller. By carefully choosing the PWM frequency, you can make the iris blades vibrate, removing the static friction while you vary the position by changing the duty cycle. To reduce wear and audible sound, you could switch to a much higher frequency with the same duty cycle once the iris is in position. If anyone tried this, please let us know if it works!
×