Jump to content

djleon111

Members
  • Content Count

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. and where can i find this 1mc ircut ?
  2. what are you talking about i just need an advice about what we should invest we dont need any loans for this matter. we located in Houston ,Texas what would be a good place to talk to about this type of cameras ?
  3. what is the best place to get it ? and hybrid ?!?
  4. the money is not an issue my friend ... if it was your office . and you wanted to see you employees live during time of work but in a good decent quality and with out a delay of 12 minutes !! what type of system you will put there ?
  5. simple answer: you need more bandwidth - that is, a faster internet connection at your workplace. specifically, you need a faster *upstream* speed, the speed at which the remote dvr can *send* the data. mp cameras like jakesoundels suggests are great for high-quality local viewing and recording, but they won't solve the problem of remote viewing; in fact, if your upstream is too slow, the higher data rates will only make the problem worse. first step is to check with your isp about packages with faster upstream speeds *for your business*. we just upgrade the circuits to 12 mb and it's 8 mgb upload in the speed test at the rest of the computer ? do we need to change and give more "power" to the specific IP of the dvr ? like raise the upload speed for that that might help ? but it is a swan dvr kinda simple version ? what is more important in this case the dvr ? the cameras ? or the internet connection ? like which trigger is more important ?
  6. money is not the issue thae owner is in Poland and this is my task so he can see it better ... but will be the exact system that you would recommend ?
  7. Hello , i need an advise for my business at the moment i have 8 cameras and i attached a file of a screen shot of the quality i can watch it from home .... what do i need to do and purchase to get a live with no delay streaming and if possible on HD quality (or at least more reasonable then the attached photo shows )
×