rory

The BNC Male end goes into the DVR input, the Output from the camera goes into one of the Females, and the output to the RF Modulator goes on the other female end. Personally i rarely use them myself though. You twist it so the Female ends point upward and downward, so that they clear the other BNC inputs on the DVR.

Yes but they are in their format so you need the Player. Their quality at 352x240 is much crisper and distortion free, than the ones you posted, but anything over that becomes more pixelised. On the local monitor though they are clear at full resolution, but then what decent stand alone isnt .. Course i set all my DVRs to highest quality available. I cant speak for their new Wavejet compression DVRs though, which I believe is probably Jpeg2000, it maybe better in higher res on the PC file, than the Wavelet versions I use/d.

We still depend on the British Privy Council to determin the laws here, for certain things, and they had petitions from 2 convicted murderours on death row, which they just used to determine that the death penalty for murder currently in our country is inhumane and illegal .. or something like that. They are now saying all the hangings from the 1960's were illegal and this and that .. basically what has happened up to now that anyone convicted of murder was automatically sentenced to death .. though the previous government from 1992 to 2002 did around 10 hangings, there has been none within this current government, and also, crime has increased 10 fold ... hopefully we will eventually break away from the UKs higher courts and use our own judgement soon, as the UK is a totally different society without the crime on the level we have over here. Without the Threat of death for murder, as you can see the amount of murders has increased, as the criminals just dont care anymore, all they will do is end up going to Prison, and like most can get sentences as low as 1 year to 7 years for cold blooded murder.

I used multiplexers, which have loop outs, so no need for T-Connectors. I used short RCA Cables, since the input on the RF Modulator is RCA, and I used RCA-BNC adaptors for the connection to the Multiplexer Loop outs. If the RF Modulator is right next to the DVR/Mux, then no need for amps. If the distance is far from the RF Modulator to the Cable TV split, then you may want some CatTV Amps. Depends on the app. In my case the Cable TV out to the TVs were amplified already in an OnQ box, and the distance from the RF mod to the Cable TV split was less than 50'. Rory T-Connector:

When you say F connector .. that doesnt sound like its BNC/RCA .?? You need to use Composite into the RF Modulator, then output with CatTV connectors and coax. The cheapest way if the DVR doesnt have a loop through/out, and you dont have a quad or CCTV Video Distributor, is to use a BNC T-Connector. Rory

BNC or RCA, doesnt matter, but must be Composite. Which DVR is it, and does it have a loop out? Rory

There are different ways to do this, but here is how i recently did a 3 channel version .. 3 Outputs from the Multiplexer (or DVR in your Case), requires loop out, or you could use a T-connector but ive never used them myself. Those ouputs go into the 3 inputs on the 3 Channel RF Modulator which is sitting right by the DVR. Then a RG6 Cable TV Coax goes from the output on the RF Modulator run to where the cable TV main cable splits off to go out to the TVs in the house. Right before the split use a 2 way splitter (2 in - 1 out) and connect the Coax from the RF Modulator into one, the Cable TV Cable into the other. Then add a single low pas filter inbetween the 2 in 1 out splitter, and the cable that goes to split off to the other TVs in the house. That filters out 4 channels and the channel range depends on which filter you purchase, in my case it was channels 71-78, and set them to Channels 72, 74, and 76, as you have to skip a channel - so if using a 4 channel Modulator it could be for example 72, 74, 76, 78, or 71, 73, 75, 77 ... Thats all there is too it, this is not for Digital Cable though. This is the modulator i used: CVT3ub/uhf-II # 3 input, table-top design # Ultra Band 65-135*, UHF 14-78 (Excluding 95-99) # PLL crystal controlled oscillator # Non volatile memory But you would probably want this one for 4 channels: E4200 # Economical 4 Input Ultra Band 65-135 # UHF 14-78 (Excluding 95-99) Filter: 3205/71-78 # Low/High Pass Tier Filter # Blocks CATV 71-78 # 2 channel slope

Yep i Know what you mean. Ive used the GE with GeoVision, but the client primarily used the GE KTD-405 Keyboard, which allows super fast control. They use the Kalatel Protocol, which almost every DVR will support. You do need a convertor from GE and also the box from Geo though to connect it up. there's a couple other guys on here that could give a little more info without having to look it up, as I did it last summer and only for one client, but it worked like a snap. Rory

im switchin to Churches Chicken .. http://www.petatv.com/downloads/pam_kfc_long.zip

I dont know, will have to wait to hear from Larry on that.

And AnyKeeper dont forget .... there's others that pop up from time to time but basically just want to keep the most busiest out of the general section so people can post other questions in that section . cause yeap the other ones end up being bumped down off the first page pretty quick.. maybe should make this a poll, lets wait to hear back from the others first. thanks Rory

Yeah I was thinking along the same lines, though not just Geo, one for each most popular DVR, at least for the PC Card section as its busier than the others.

So how does this Guardian match up to a professional system like Ademco ..?? I mean you can program any zone to be a silent panic, or an audible zone, on any alarm system.

My Cameras were 380TVL $50 Bullets .. Imagine if they were a Panasonic

does it use WaveReader? Or other software?

Seek and yee shall find A section dedicated to Video Clips from any DVR/NVR: http://www.cctvforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=4466

Its good for a non Windows DVR - in Full Screen or larger than 320x240. Though I have seen better quality at 320x240 generally from Wavelet or Mjpeg DVRs. Benefit of H.264 is less HDD space used and ofcourse faster Streaming video (though I get real time streaming video with Mpeg4). Would be nice if you could record with other compression methods, and stream over the network with H.264, something like how the Iview DVR does it, with Mpeg4 and Wavelet. Overall that recorded video file looks good for a non Windows DVR, though they really need to improve the client GUI cosmetically, and add a 16 camera view. As for locally and how the DVR holds up, would need some real world testing to comment on that, though most decent stand alones are very high quality on the local monitor. What Jasper said, with most decent PC DVRs you will get the same or better quality for evidence sharing.

So it connects to the SMTP server but the Server isnt sending ... Perhaps they arent doing the Authentication Properly ... PM me the SMTP server and ill take a quick look

2mb and 750k up is $30 here. Gas $9.........win some............. gas $5 here, no free medical or any government assistance. but doesnt rain much

yeah same here, 128 upload DSL here, ADSL costs $490 a month!

Dont know, but thats real cheap for those speeds .. the faster upload speed the better.

no page found ..

yep, actually its 352x240, i got a 11kbps data rate

probably just the quality setting ... can we see the highest? i wanna see what glasses those are

What i mean is, can you change it from H264 to Mpeg4 or Wavelet? As those are better quality settings. Just curious ..