kelvin

you may try this no-ip.com

Please do correct me if im wrong... MJPEG - picture format - bigger file size - great for system which is not real time recording MPEG4 - video format - smaller file size - great for system which is real-time recording

What does it mean by Hybrid solution system? How it work just can consider is Hybrid solution?

Of course H.264 compression file size definitely smaller than MPEG4. But in term of pricing..... it is pretty "nice" as well. Let's imagine 100 units of H.264 IP cameras or video server, how much will it cost.......hehe

I don really understand what is that I custom make all my ethernet to carry DC current on the brown and blue wires so I do not need to run an extra wire to power a camera, even if that camera is not POE capable. As i know in order to run cat5 with DC power and you have to apply using balun. So do you need any balun for youor custom made cat5?? if not need, mind to share how you do it?

Anyone can explain the POE full name and the definition? I don really understand what is that

I will suggest install video server in each outlet for direct internet connection without pass through the PC or DVR. The recording will be done in the HQ. reason - save cost on purchase PC or DVR - less maintenance on the 40 outlet in future - avoid intruder harm your PC/DVR becox it is common to see intruder harm or direct bring the PC/DVR away - Video server allow multi-site preview, record and playback in the same time - Able to Remote Central Managment via LAN or internet - Remote control via specific IP video. - Remote anolog video through LAN or internet - Less bandwidth - Able to fix with different type of camera based on site requirement Specification - 2ch or 4ch video server depend on the outlet camera need. - MPEG4 - Smaller file size and better quality - CIF resolution - medium resolution but can avoid of bandwidth bottle neck in HQ remote view/record/playback. Most important less internet monthly subscription unless you have the budget then you may think to go for D1 resolution. - 5-7fps remote view/recording - less kbps to download in HQ. can avoid of bandwidth bottle neck in HQ remote view/record/playback. still the same...unless you got the budget then may go for high FPS. - Auto reconnect function - Remote Motion/Schedule/Continuous recording For HQ - 7 PCs and each pc with 16 video - less burden on the RAM, graphic board...etc - internet access with dynamic IP or fix IP - use bandwidth management controller to control the bandwidth run in smooth and faster condition Most important you have to understand by yourself what do you want this surveillance system to do for you and what is your budget limit. Then you will come out with a clear picture on which product will be more suitable to you.

I need to setup a simple a wireless surveillance for short term at a place of 50m diameters. Any idea how to do it

Thank you msecure.... Im Kelvin not TCS .... heheh Picture quality is very important... Actually im thinking not to apply wireless IPcamera because i need to setup some box and IR camera. I heard that if using a wireless transmitter or wireless ip web server then there will be no issue on install whatever camera also can right?? Let say for 8 camera about 50m from DVR to camera. What is ur comment of how to do it and which brand should i go? CollinR - you got the solution for using solllar poweR? will it be high cost? how to do it?

about 8units of camera for about 3 days

Nice video... next time be more concern on self safety.... you may get hurt so near them...

In what way doing video output is the best solution? Here are the case: PC base application DVR board without VGA output From PC to slave monitor site approximate 200m Here are the few way i had think about: T-join : Signal split and cause two site having signal drop problem. Multiplexer : Worry of the video output signal drop as well. Booster : add the booster to any one above mention solution and signal may be running well. direct VGA ouput from Graphic card : don know the result, never try before. Any other way of doing video output for 200m you have try before and the signal will be good also?

It will be 16ch in quad mode

analog camera and ip cam both got their own pro and con. it only depend on your application which is more suitable for you.

I believe most of us doing remote viewing through a thrid party like no-ip or dyndns. what if one day they are no more be free anymore? subscribe a fix ip will be expensive and i know some expensive dvr mamunfacturer do have their own server. Is there any other way to do remote viewing by not using no-ip or dyndns services?

actually this is not my system and i have check out.... Misternetwork I will check whether they are connect direct from server or just through router. As what i know they are using a dynamic IP. further details need to confirm when im on site VST_man thanks.... will check the seting for the router Thomas thank for you info, got to one by one checking Thank you everyone information, i will go my customer site again within this few day. then will let you know

I got problem on pc doing remote view. here is the situation. Server site is using a PC based dvr. The remote viewing will be on for 24hrs everyday. When continue remote viewing for about 1 - 2 days, then the remote viewing will be disconnect. Once disconnect you are not able to reconnect for remote view until the server site restart the pc. Once server site pc restart then im able to do remote view again. What actually cause this problem? is it because of the RAM or bandwidth on server site get into bottle neck or any other reason?? All comments are welcome.... thanks

so what do u need? need some product source or need help on the solution? the software is pretty expensive

great rory... lets us know when u have done

Well, actually im not really good in wireless system. In my location, branded like GE, bosch, Pana.... etc is pretty high price and im not affortable to have such hi-end product. As you know in the market any wireless product (point 2 point) price is reasonable and could perform well? since i said in my last post for site with diameter 80m. for P2P wireless, do i have to add a Access Point to extand the distance?

I was thinking is it possible to setup a temporary cctv system. let's say 16 cameras with a installation site diameter 80m. it has to be simple installation and easily to remove (i mean not a very complicated system design). Recording is a MUST. I was thinking to use a wireless system but no idea on which type of wireless application.

MK-4 is a brand. But im not sure whether they do exporting or is there any branch in your area. http://www.mk-four.com.my check out with them for more information

Wavelet is good for time-lapse when you are doing playback. MPEG4 is nice if you are in real-time recording.

night club sometimes we have to think about customer privacy. most customer don like under observation env. go with night vision camera. there is a type of night vision camera that you will never see the LED beam light but i have forgotten the name.... try to check out with your suplier.

Commscope is copper cover metal, it is for CATV not CCTV. you will easily get interference. not to use such cable even though it is cheap, in the end result you spend more on recovery. If you are looking cheap full copper cable, try for MK-4 or some other. In theory if the CATV coaxial cable is cover with at least 23% of copper then you can use it for CCTV, anyway it is not recommended.