ommarfarooq

could you send me the link to download the same tool. as not partners yet.... so have to figure out ways to do so....

thanks for the information about servers.. what about the storage? how many expansion modules i need , max we can have 30 tb module from Avigilon attached with servers, and why we cant have San storage as primary storage? 2 MP - 201 11 MP - 8 5 MP - 11 PTZ - 26 TOTAL : 246 CAMERA at 12 f/s and 70 % motion all cameras at full resolution for all cameras.

for 1300 Mbps That is grt, we have 250 cameras proposed hardware from avigilon goes like below 1. NV Server ( upto 128 cameras each max from avigilon) proposed three of them for future expandability. 2. NVR expansion Module 30TB Each . ( no. of expansion modules is too many) i want to reduce the no of expansion modules, as total storage is around 700 TB. could you help on this to suggest some better solution or we could use some software for compression? all system from avigilon will be best?

Thanks Guys however i need some major reasons to defend myself not to use NAS storage (ISILON) for survellance as a primary storage however could use as back up. i am willing to use RAID 6 arrays as i am pretty comfortable with that but have to motivate client on this, need some valid technical points to justify. we are talking about more than 250 cameras above 2 Mega pixel, which means above 500 Mbps throughput/ingest rate. could anyone add comments on this??

Hi all, could anyone help on this.. why Nas storage cannot be used as a primary storage for survallance, what i could figure out is as below. NAS provides only file level access to a storage volume while DAS and SAN provide block level access. In surveillance, block level access is required by most systems, including Avigilon Control Center (ACC). As a result, file level access and the use of network attached storage is typically limited to applications with very few cameras. Please specify if any other reasons?

anyone could help on this.. why Nas storage is not prefered as primary storage for cctv survellance, what i could figure out is as below: NAS provides only file level access to a storage volume while DAS and SAN provide block level access. In surveillance, block level access is required by most systems, including Avigilon Control Center (ACC). As a result, file level access and the use of network attached storage is typically limited to applications with very few cameras. Please specify if any other reasons?