CCTV_Suppliers

You need the uploader to update your firmware... Never tried with browser before and not sure if it will work.

Thanks... just curious... excellent pictures...

The best I can gather from our technical people and also from GE directly, if the firmware has been damaged, there is no reset of it on the motherboard. The correct firmware uploader info and the firmware should have these... Uploader: http://www.gesecurity.com/portal/site/GESecurity/menuitem.11620ebca5cc0a06574efe10140041ca/?vgnextoid=2d09cabfcd6a9110VgnVCM100000592d7003RCRD# StoreSafe II 10 channel firmware: http://www.gesecurity.com/portal/site/GESecurity/menuitem.11620ebca5cc0a06574efe10140041ca/?vgnextoid=2d09cabfcd6a9110VgnVCM100000592d7003RCRD# One of the engineers at GE recommended to take the onboard battery from the motherboard, wait for 10 minutes and plug it back in.. but what he was concerned was the version of the motherboard.. Newer motherboards apparently came with this option, but older ones did not have them.

If this project real, then wouldn't it be great if at one point is becomes part of the computer parts?? Probably wishful thinking, but hope this technology becomes part of the computer industry soon.

Which software was used to capture these images... they look great.

You're web pages are they built on some template? I have seen some webistes that looks preyy much the same setup/different graphics that I think are hoax web pages and also some of them there is warnings on the web to not pay in advance for any goods. I dont think you have anything to do with it, just to understand if there are someone using the same template. JD JD, have no idea what you are referring to... We use Magento platform and use many templates... and not sure what you mean by means of warning on the web to not pay in advance...

Which Hikvision camera are you using??

Just in case, American Dynamics IP software (Triedent) is one of my favorites too (linux based)... and the Bosch Enterprise software too (Windows based)... We toyed around with Panasonic version, but it did not do well... they OEM the software from someone else, not sure who... OnSSI looked very nice... But as always, the cost of these solutions is what I have a serious problems... cost per IP connection, cost for the software, yearly costs (maintenance or otherwise), etc...

Can you please explain what you mean "native H.264 compression at the server side"? this does not make any sense to me. What cameras does this software curently support? Guys, lets not change the topic of this thread... if you do not understand the comments, then we will address it in a different thread about it. At the moment, it works with 33 different cameras (including IP PTZ domes) that we could get our hand on... and more should come soon... some manufacturers give them to us and some we buy... So, what is your favorite and why...

So the way I understand "Intellevision" is your "secret Linux weapon" u have been talking about ? just curios No secret bud.. just another application that has been maturing in very high profile locations.. I know that it will evolve more as the time goes by, but for now, the release timeline still is intact... - but then again, this is not the thread to address this software...

Enterprise software solution? Well, how about Intellevision! It has over 52 installed bases right now mainly in military and government locations with special requirements... pertinent to resolution requirements and more importantly video analytics using FLIR cameras... This is the software that will be released on December to general public for use at no cost... with limitations up to 1028 cameras capable, native H.264 compression at the server side and more... Dependent on application and besides Intellevision, the Genetec looks good and as well as Eyesoft, Exacq and even Milestone.. Some of the priopetary once are ok - Avigilon looks great and so does D-Link and others... My one beef with all these various solutions is the cost... and of course that is a different thread all together...

http://www.cracked.com/blog/using-windows-7-may-lead-to-murder/comment-page-14/ I though this was hilarious...

I thought the author did a great job in creation of that article... very funny and ingenious.. Now, if only Win7 operates as advertised... I have been using Windows 7 Ultimate in the last few months (download trial copy) and it is better than Vista for sure... but still have occasional crashes that makes no sense... broken links, driver incompatibilities, etc... They may eventually get it... who knows. Unlike XP when came out, which was a major change of operating system vs. it predecessors, looks like Win7 is glorified Vista... with some useful features. Will it worth the money to upgrade to Win7?? I do not think so... most of my workstations still work with Win2000 without any problems and some work on XP... few Linus distros that I have yet to see fail... but then again, this is Microsoft's latest and I am sure many will convert...

ADTTE for VM96 ISN'T compatible with MP48... You can't mix one with the other... You need the new ADTTE touchtracker or ControlCenter 200/300 model or AD2089 series keyboard... here: http://americandynamics.net/products/matrix_home.aspx

Your questions do not offend me but your unprovoked attack did. So, if it is not my questions, then must be Lamborghini comment?

http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/23821/ Boys at MIT actually are doing something different and even more interesting for this same concept that IBM started talking about it few years back... working on binary side instead of the actual code... very interesting...

The best I can gather, yes... since they are making notation that correction of the software takes place in binary... I have been following this article for the last two days... and somehow it has very restrictive publications.. As matter of fact, there are no "test" bench results or any publication in any reputable magazine... at least not for now... If so, the question is how they do it.. One of the channels recommended that upon BIOS load startup, it loads into the RAM and then follows activities of higher language software applications... and monitors major "execution" of an application that has not been learned yet... How it learns through its AI content is yet another interesting angle that not much could be found.. One of the articles was mentioning that if IE is attacked, it fixes this potential vulnerability... Well, that is great, but how? It has to know the exact premise how such product works and then monitor changes that it is being forced to adhere... which then apparently it takes over and closes such vulnerability... Sound like something you see in Scientific movie, but I guess this one is a reality... We will wait and see where this goes.. I know I will continue tracking it..

thewireguys, I am very relaxed and extremely calm... you or anybody can not give me any reason to get upset about anything... After all, I thought we are sharing ideas here.. Next time please do not assume on anything - you do not know who your audiences are - some may not reply and some will. If someone asks a question (a question that had nothing to do with any specific brand for that matter), it does not quantify that they do not know anything about it. Rather, they may be testing you and others to learn everyone elses opinions... If my type of questions offend you, then you do not have to respond. I really care less about attitudes created from nothing - in my case asking a simple question.. If you do not want to share your estimated costs for such Enterprise Software solutions, then don't... but do not take a different stand that has nothing to do with the question.

Rory, as I said, I did not read who the manufacturer was, so thanks for the reply... Very impressive specs indeed, but those two items in the spec are deal breaker for me... I do not think 16MP camera would come down to $80 range - I will tell you though that 2MP cameras are coming down below $250 range and lower in some cases... and they all spit out H2.64 compressed video.. and it is not an Arecont camera either... I will give maximum six months for pricing on MP cameras to stabilize under $200...

Of course not... your and my software are "special" breed... What I really liked about this concept of "fixing" software on the fly is that it actually takes place at the binary level... not something IBM was talking about few years back... However... What if this technology gets on wrong hands??? It can destroy the entire software infrastructure.. or better yet, take over the entire Internet software platform... I will not be surprised if this software somehow disappears in a short time and we probably will never hear about it again... for obvious reasons of course... Very interesting technology that can do many good things, but I do not think we will ever see it in actual world around us...

I based my reply on the manufacturer specs: 0.1 lux minimum illumination Lens f stops obviously effect ALL cameras but in this case I am highlighting that the manufacturers spec of 0.1 lux, regardless of what lens it has, is not good enough for a day night application in "most" cases. I really dont need to know what lenses are available for that camera either, as I would never buy a $15,000 camera. If I did not know Rory, then I would have said "Great Job" in finding this flaw, but I do not expect anything less from him anyway - You are the best man.. and I mean it! Interestingly enough that spec alone will kill any deal that may be cooking at the moment... How can someone pay this type of pricing (not including similar level of lens pricing or higher) and then have this type of lux level... Wow... I will add one more: - Lossless JPEG2000 compression Are you kidding me?? Most of the known systems are spitting out H.264 compression and this camera at that price is pushing antiquated compression?? I did not have a chance to see who the manufacturer is or the product code... can anyone please provide this info if available?

Who actually attacked you my friend? Here is your post reply against me: CCTV_Suppliers I am gonna assume you don't know anything about Avigilon. I wander how you "assumed" this when my question was very specific on pricing of Enterprise Solutions?? Looks to me that you rather not read posts and reply on what you assume it states... Lets see now, who is attacking who again? Man, get your story straight and do not create something that is not there nor "assume" on anything that is above your level of comprehension... I guess if you do not want to take the challenge on pricing of your software solutions, then say you do not want to or can not do it. Do not turn this thread to gain some personal gratification on your level of expertise...

Very good observation... What is the key on this is how you describe - as unless someone is spending as much on the lens as for the camera, the outcome will never be optimized. Very few manufacturers actually may even support this high end MP cameras... just makes no economical sense to produce them, since usage will be bare minimal... in some cases these lenses actually costs twice as much as the camera itself... We have been toying around with very high end IP cameras from DALSA with extremely high res (higher than 16M) and lenses at the same level... Picture quality is out of this world and ability to zoom multiple time and almost no pixelization is the gravy... Not a technology for mainstream, but has its potential military and government uses.. They are already the main supplier for space exploration projects... They tried in movie industry (the last 007 (Quantum of Solace) movie was shot with their technology cameras), but decided to pull back due to limitations on how many of these cameras can they sell...

Man, you are a firecracker aren't you? This shows that you are new in this industry. All I asked is a question and I see that you want to take this matter to a different direction... Good things will follow sooner than later my friend... I will not share anything here as this thread is not addressing what you ask... Do you really want a pissing contest man? I already know what your limitations are, so do not go there. My intention was to ask few simple questions about pricing for so called "Enterprise level systems" and if you want to take this to somewhere else, then bring it on... Any IP software that charges more than a $1 is not a good solution for most. May be good for selected few which accounts for top 1%, how about the ordinary "Joe". I know you will disagree with this, as you do not know any better... as your calcs on Exacq shown in one of the other threads... Again, just to keep this in perspective, all I am asking for prices for these Enterprises Solutions to substantiate not if they work, rather how many people actually are using and average pricing in the market.. I know what the prices are, do you besides Exacq?

dude..... I never said you don't know what your taking about . I was simply explaining if you want the best image quality on the market right now Avigilon is the only option and that their cameras only work with their software. When making comments like this, please make sure that you know what you are talking about and who you are referring your comments to! Just to keep everything on the same playing field, I have all these cameras and software from all the manufacturers, you name it, I have it - so that you understand that I have little more knowledge than you do. I have some cameras that you have not even heard of yet nor will have access to sell... some starting at $50K and higher... My questions were not which camera comes with the best image nor which software is better... rather trying to see if you and others are willing to share your charge amounts for for such applications. I thought I did make it clear, but I guess you missed it again...