sviviani 0 Posted May 1, 2009 i got a good laugh out of this http://www.i-am-bored.com/bored_link.cfm?link_id=40064 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scorpion 0 Posted May 1, 2009 I am sorry that was version 1.0. We have recently received version 5.0 Why would you want such top heavy software slowing down your computer? The 5.0 version is much clear then what you were showing in the video link. Also there are new tools in the 5.0 release that make the one in the link appear like stone age technology! LOL! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sviviani 0 Posted May 1, 2009 i'm always behind on these things Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hardwired 0 Posted May 1, 2009 Hell, any camera could do that. Just take the FOV (approx 10' at subject), you need a resolution of at least 400 pixels square at the basketball, imaged onto the subject's eye (~.5") So 800 pixels / inch at eye, X FOV (120") = 96000 Linear pixel, assuming standard 4x3 format = 72000 vertical pixels = 6912 Megapixel imager. I think the nannycam I saw on line for 49 bucks will do that, right? Or was that the Hubble telescope, after they fixed the optics, that I'm thinking of? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hardwired 0 Posted May 1, 2009 Oh, and with a 1.67 um pixel pitch, (taken from the Aptina 10mp sensor data sheet) the imager would need to be about 10 inches by 7.5 inches.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
