loopedagain 0 Posted February 20, 2005 Anybody know anything about this unit? http://www.swann.com.au/show_item.php?item=151 Specifically, with 9 cameras will the picture be jumpy at this recording speed? Thanks, Robert. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rory 0 Posted February 20, 2005 http://www.avtech.com.tw/english/product_13_776w.htm this is the manufacturer .. It is multiplexed so yes, it will be a multiplexed (jumpy) recording. Its 25pps / 9 = 2.7 ... pps per camera - Real Time is 30pps. But its good for the price. If you want real time or close to real time, you will be spending much more $$ ... Its a low end product, good for those home or budget retail installs. this is the one im using for those jobs, its not much more.. http://www.avtech.com.tw/english/product_13_777w.htm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
loopedagain 0 Posted February 20, 2005 I got it at Fry's on sale and with a 250 gig drive I have about $800.00 in it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rory 0 Posted February 20, 2005 250GB brought the price up, but still thats a retail price. They bought it from Swan, who bought it from elsewhere and labeled it with their name. Hence all the markups. Also, the higher end 9 or 10 channel DVRs retail for much more than that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
loopedagain 0 Posted February 20, 2005 Well, I hooked one camera up for a test and with the 9 little boxes on, there is no hesitation or freezing. I guess when all cameras are hooked up that might be different? Thanks in advance. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rory 0 Posted February 20, 2005 Yes, it divides the 25pps among the amount of cameras connected. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Powertelecomm 0 Posted February 21, 2005 FYI - I believe the one you found at Fry's is the non-networkable model, which is usually priced about $150-$200 less than the network models (like the AVC-776W that Rory linked). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wahloon 0 Posted February 21, 2005 Tryed there product and did not like it at all. First it was to expensive for the quality, and second not networkable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites