thewireguys 3 Posted May 17, 2010 Sawbones could you please post both images from the Panny and Mobotix in full resolution. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rory 0 Posted May 17, 2010 Sawbones could you please post both images from the Panny and Mobotix in full resolution. While he is at it, a shot of a properly focused pano, or least one captured on a decent DVR. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
survtech 0 Posted May 17, 2010 ...plus consider all the cancer causing stuff the wireless is putting out there What proof do you have of that? http://www.govtech.com/articles/104994 - The Dubious Link Between Wireless and Cancer GovTech http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs304/en/" - Considering the very low exposure levels and research results collected to date, there is no convincing scientific evidence that the weak RF signals from base stations and wireless networks cause adverse health effects." - WHO Fact sheet N°304, May 2006 - Electromagnetic fields and public health Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sawbones 0 Posted May 21, 2010 Sawbones could you please post both images from the Panny and Mobotix in full resolution. While he is at it, a shot of a properly focused pano, or least one captured on a decent DVR. That Pano is focused as well as it can be... and the image is taken directly off its attached Axis 241Q camera server. That image reflects a real-world image through that camera, with everything that entails, including dust and dirt and pollen on the dome surface (which was pretty dirty for that picture... just like it would be after about a week in an actual install) Here's the full-size, 3MP mobotix night image. It's set at a pretty fast 1/60 shutter speed, which degrades the image quality just a bit. Slowing the shutter makes this pic look a LOT better... but I'd rather sacrifice that to get better images of somebody moving through that area. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rory 0 Posted May 21, 2010 That Pano is focused as well as it can be... and the image is taken directly off its attached Axis 241Q camera server. That image reflects a real-world image through that camera, with everything that entails, including dust and dirt and pollen on the dome surface (which was pretty dirty for that picture... just like it would be after about a week in an actual install) Then I would have to say there is something wrong with the camera, or your encoder. Ive seen $50 bullet cameras with a better picture then that. Literally, go pick up one of the KT&C Color 550TVL bullets and you would see it blows that image away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thewireguys 3 Posted May 21, 2010 Rory the color Panny looks the same as your jeep image. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rory 0 Posted May 21, 2010 Rory the color Panny looks the same as your jeep image. that would be pretty shabby then since that jeep image was a camera from 8+ years ago and it only cost $50 plus it was only 380TVL max. Now .. you really should try the KT&C color bullet .. it will blow your mind boss man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites