Danny79 0 Posted November 27, 2007 Ok heres the question. I work for the cable company, Im an installer and we use RG-6 for the cable. But why is RG-59 used for cameras? I know why we use RG-6 but the only thing I can think of using the 59 is because of flexibility. If there is no difference, then I can buy the connectors and the crimping tools and use my wire and then go buy the power wire separately. Does that make sense? Whats the benefit of using RG-59? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lolo Wolf 0 Posted November 27, 2007 Danny, here is a good read for you http://www.abccables.com/info-rg59-vs-rg6.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lolo Wolf 0 Posted November 27, 2007 To insure a quality signal for your cctv installs use RG59 95%copper and avoid the typical cable company compression F connects (although Im sure you have access to plenty of them) use BNC and follow the standard cable guidelines for your runs/pulls entry, terminations etc... by doing so will you will be less prone to problems and rework. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
survtech 0 Posted November 28, 2007 You can't use cable intended for RF for LF signals. While there's nothing wrong with RG-6 per se, all coax for CCTV video must be constructed with pure copper, not copper clad steel. RF signals travel on the outside of the conductor; this is known as the "skin effect". For that reason, only the very outer area of a conductor needs to be low resistance once the signal exceeds a certain frequency. As I recall, the nominal cutoff frequency for using clad vs. solid copper is 10-20MHz. See below: Depth of penetration at 60 Hz, δ = .857cm; Depth of penetration at 10 KHz, δ=.066cm; Depth of penetration at 10 MHz, δ=.0021cm = 21 microns With the price of copper as compared to steel, it makes sense to manufacture RF cables out of steel with a thin copper coating. This is not the case with CCTV as its lower frequency (<10MHz) means that the signal travels nearer the center of the conductor. Since steel has a much higher electrical resistance than copper, a CCTV signal would attenuate rapidly in a clad cable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scorpion 0 Posted November 28, 2007 I really respect that you asked for some opinions before you started your project. It sounds more like you are a Master Tech, and are in charge of training new recruits, and you are the type to get "all of your ducks in a row". The guys at Groupware International Broadband (G I Broadband) will probably still you away from the company that you work for now!! I am really glad you had some input before you ended up with a mess on your hands. Now if only you could use your RF meter to check out cameras!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites