kdberg 0 Posted October 28, 2004 Installing two DVRs in the same customer location. They already have a single static ip through roadrunner, and will now need to access either dvr remotely over the internet. Looking for recommendation of routers / network appliances with multi-NAT support that will correctly route incoming traffice based upon which static ip address it came in on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heloder 0 Posted October 28, 2004 This will not be easy. You will need a router that can announce two IP address and route them to the proper location. May I recommend Cisco. Or you can use two different ports on the DVR’s to transmit video. Your remote software must have the ability to change ports on a per site basis. Are these PC base or embedded? What manufacture? Can you change the ports that the video transmits on? Can you specify the ports that the client software uses on a per site basis? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ezCCTV 0 Posted October 28, 2004 If you are using GeoVision, this is easy to via the software, using different ports as heloder suggested. A good router that supports multiple NAT is the Draytek Vigor 2600. That is the router we use. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thomas 0 Posted October 28, 2004 The consumer grade stuff isn't going to do it, not well and not cheaply. Is the software using some sort of webserver? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kdberg 0 Posted October 28, 2004 It's actually a mix of DVRs, Dedicated Micro DS2 and Kalatel so far. Both have imbedded web servers, and I wanted the user to be able to connect to each via default port 80 as well as being able to use manufacturer specific viewing software. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thomas 0 Posted October 28, 2004 K, a couple of things that might work. If you can change the ports to something else, you can use a service like no-ip.com to do a port redirect. If the manufactures software can deal with that then you should be golden. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heloder 0 Posted October 29, 2004 OK. You will want two static IP's behind one router. Each DVR will have a public IP. Your ISP may have a good router to do this. If not, use the Cisco SOHO 90 Series. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/rt/ps4866/index.shtml But you will need someone to help you announce the IP range in the Cisco routers. I have two people in support who worked for UUNET and MIC. We may be able to help you out. j Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kdberg 0 Posted October 29, 2004 I actually have an extra Cisco 831 router laying around. Will that work? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heloder 0 Posted October 29, 2004 Yes, looks like it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kdberg 0 Posted October 29, 2004 Anyone have experience with the ASUS Internet Security Router (SL1000)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cctv_down_under 0 Posted October 29, 2004 Is there any reason why you could not just set DVR#1 to port 81 and DVR# 2 to port 82 then just give both internal I.P. and map through the router these ports to internal I.P's all comes down to if you can change the port on the DVR... this way 1 router, no need for expense either and only one static I.P. just remember to put port extension on the I.P address you enter into the browser eg 210.216.14.82:81 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rory 0 Posted October 29, 2004 if it is a stand alone such as Kalatel it uses the same port. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cctv_down_under 0 Posted October 29, 2004 Boy... have to say that is a design flaw!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heloder 0 Posted October 29, 2004 But i don't think geo would work either. Maybe for web viewing, but what about client? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cctv_down_under 0 Posted October 29, 2004 Yep you can change the ports on all apps to suit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heloder 0 Posted October 29, 2004 but can you change the ports on the remote on a per site basis? Site A usees port 90, Site B uses port 91? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cctv_down_under 0 Posted October 29, 2004 Yes.. you change each apps port number at the DVR end, then you map those ports at the router and when connecting from an app or browser simply change the ports on app or browser. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dusan 0 Posted October 29, 2004 if you can not change ports on your crapy dvr's just use 2 low cost ~$80 routers like linksys/cisco 1 st router and 1 st dvr remap ports port 80 in 8088 out 2 nd combine all to one net out to internet on stack port numbers 8088 8089 or what ever is not use on your network to one static ip on your cable internet dusan Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VST_Man 1 Posted October 31, 2004 I have the same issue. I have a SQL Server running, a DVR running, and a Dlink DCS5300W wirless running on the same intranet. As long as I am in the intranet I have no problems communicating to them. But, when I attempt to view via the internet I can only communicate with the SQL Server. Port 80 is wide open but 81, 82, ect. are blocked by the ISP, which basically shuts down my choices. What other ports can I attempt to pass Video on and is there a better way to get around the ISP road blocks? Thanks inadvance Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thomas 0 Posted October 31, 2004 Strange that they block other ports. But some commanly used ones that should be open are: 20 FTP data (File Transfer Protocol) 21 FTP (File Transfer Protocol) 22 SSH (Secure Shell) 23 Telnet 25 SMTP (Send Mail Transfer Protocol) 43 whois 79 Finger 80 HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol) 110 POP3 (Post Office Protocol, version 3) 115 SFTP (Secure File Transfer Protocol) 119 NNTP (Network New Transfer Protocol) 123 NTP (Network Time Protocol) 137 NetBIOS-ns 138 NetBIOS-dgm 139 NetBIOS 143 IMAP (Internet Message Access Protocol) 161 SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) 194 IRC (Internet Relay Chat) 220 IMAP3 (Internet Message Access Protocol 3) 389 LDAP (Lightweight Directory Access Protocol) 443 SSL (Secure Socket Layer) 445 SMB (NetBIOS over TCP) 666 Doom 993 SIMAP (Secure Internet Message Access Protocol) 995 SPOP (Secure Post Office Protocol) 1352 Lotus Notes 1433 Microsoft SQL Server 1494 Citrix ICA Protocol 1521 Oracle SQL 1604 Citrix ICA / Microsoft Terminal Server 2049 NFS (Network File System) 3306 mySQL 5010 Yahoo! Messenger 5190 AOL Instant Messenger 5632 PCAnywhere 5800 VNC 5900 VNC 6000 X Windowing System 6699 Napster 6776 SubSeven (Trojan - security risk!) 7070 RealServer / QuickTime 7778 Unreal 8080 HTTP 26000 Quake 27010 Half-Life 27960 Quake III Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DRACONiDigital 0 Posted April 19, 2005 I know this is an old post, but I'm new here and I've got some relevant info on this subject. We have a client with over 10 Geovision servers (6.05 currently, due to mix of new and old cards), each located at a different remote location. They have a fairly complex Wide Area Network. They wanted to view ALL of their servers from the Internet (i.e., from home or anywhere else on the Internet, they wanted to pull up any of their 10+ servers). The problem? Only 5 public IPs. I ended up solving the problem using only ONE Internet IP. I installed a Linux server with firewalling software. On the Geovision side, I set up each server so that it had a unique port range. Then, I created a custom web-based (PHP/MySQL) app which had a GUI in which users could click on the server they wanted to view. It works great. Geovision must tell the ActiveX client what port range it's using, because no setup is required on client PCs. Using the Windows clients of course requires lots of setup, due to the non-standard ports. But this particular client is fine with the ActiveX viewer. Anyway, the client found the app so useful that they had me expand it to include usernames/passwords with security permissions, so certain users could only access certain sites. Of course, this wasn't REALLY blocking someone from accessing those particular ports, but none of these people are network hackers, and live by the GUI. So, if you've got lots of systems behind a firewall, keep in mind, this IS definately possible. It does require some effort, but it can most certainly be achieved! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DataAve 0 Posted April 19, 2005 Just use a $50 switch (not a router). We do it all the time. A linksys does it for us:D Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DRACONiDigital 0 Posted April 19, 2005 Just use a $50 switch (not a router). We do it all the time. A linksys does it for us:D How does a switch provide for routing capability via the Internet? Some clients think that Linksys routers are totally insecure and won't go for them. At those locations I put in a Linux router box. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DataAve 0 Posted April 20, 2005 When the DVR's (not PC Junk-High End Standalones) are the only items on THAT network a 50 dollar linksys will do. Try it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites